Robin Hood Movie Review Part II

Because of this indecision, she cannot handle the love triangle, Robin’s case, criticizing the colonial policy of the crusades, or the master-apprentice relationship with John. He tries to lighten the film with some jokes added in between, but the political discourses that follow instantly create a totally different atmosphere.

Cases added to every other from here and there, and scenes copied from the old movie, and therefore the movie that progresses blindly, fails to determine a full that may create a texture and elegance for itself. The copying in some scenes isn’t to be missed by the fans of previous movies.

The escape the church scene, for instance, is just about the identical because the movie made in 1991, right all the way down to the escape method, to the scene lines where Robin reveals his identity to steer the general public.

Even a number of Egerton’s movements, who seem to own watched the scene, evoke Costner, but unfortunately the film doesn’t have the competence that we are able to consider as a stance of homage. We don’t object to the utilization of references from other films or to the discourse of taking from the rich to the poor, but combining these references between the story and using it functionally doesn’t make much sense unless there’s an imaginative way. In other words, once you throw such a big amount of different flavors into the pot and blend them, unfortunately, you do not get a delicious meal.

Let’s leave the rhetoric, style and consistency of the movie, let’s get immersed within the action, the action scenes of the movie are as uncreative as they depend upon shooting arrows within the air in one or two slow motions and street fight scenes, not even shying removed from using the identical trick twice. the sole thing which will be said positively about the movie is that the costume and set designs. Although its compatibility with the story is debatable because of its modern lines, the costumes are quite unique and fluffy. Ali. When it involves acting, Jamie Dornan, Ben Mendelsohn, Jamie Fox and even Murray Abraham offer exaggerated performances that are off from convincing. Coming to Egerton, a minimum of he manages to provide the impression that he wouldn’t be a nasty fictional character if the script, editing, and co-stars had helped him a touch.

In fact, it’s a good success to supply a tasteless movie with such a famous actor, with such an enormous budget, out of a story that was so popular and whose political material was just the correct time for it. during a world where Guy Ritchie’s unique interpretation of fictitious character, which was adapted to the large screen dozens of times together with his creativity, couldn’t change into a trilogy, this movie, which couldn’t even be an agreeable spectacle manufactured from clich├ęs, ended by leaving the door receptive the second movie, which you’ll be able to predict are going to be even more bland than the primary. It’s unbelievable, really.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *